kris A WCAG conformance roadmap is a sequenced plan that moves an organization from unknown accessibility status to documented conformance with WCAG 2.1 AA or 2.2 AA. The roadmap defines what gets evaluated, in what order, who fixes what, how progress is verified, and how conformance is maintained over time. Building one starts with scoping the
The shift from WCAG 2.1 to 2.2 introduces new success criteria that expand what an audit evaluates, with most additions focused on cognitive accessibility, authentication, and interaction on touch devices. Audits conducted against 2.2 cover everything in 2.1 plus the added criteria at the same conformance level. One criterion present in 2.1 was removed from
Tracking accessibility remediation across a project means maintaining a single source of truth for every identified issue, its location, its severity, its assigned owner, its fix status, and its validation result. Without structured tracking, remediation stalls, duplicate work occurs, and conformance claims become impossible to support. The teams that complete remediation on time treat the
To assign WCAG issues priority, rank each issue by two factors: user impact (how severely the issue blocks people with disabilities) and legal risk (how commonly the issue appears in demand letters and lawsuits). Issues that score high on both get fixed first. Issues that score low on both go last. This approach moves conformance
AI tools fit into WCAG conformance work as efficiency aids that support human experts, not as replacements for them. They translate technical requirements into plain language, suggest code for fixing specific issues, explain audit findings to developers, and generate portions of documentation like VPATs and Accessibility Conformance Reports. What AI cannot do is conduct an
Scan tools belong at the start and throughout a WCAG project as a fast, repeatable way to surface a portion of accessibility issues. They are an input, not an answer. Used well, scans speed up a WCAG project by clearing obvious code-level issues before human evaluation begins and by monitoring for regressions after remediation. Used
Mapping Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.2 AA to an audit plan means assigning every applicable success criterion to a specific evaluation step, page, or component so nothing gets overlooked. The process turns an abstract standard into a structured, repeatable checklist your team can follow from start to finish. Mapping WCAG 2.2 AA to an
AI speeds up certain parts of ADA compliance work, but it cannot replace the human evaluation that accessibility requires. Organizations adopting AI for compliance should understand exactly where it helps and where it creates a false sense of progress. AI in ADA Compliance: Current Capabilities Area Current State of AI Accessibility Audits AI cannot conduct
The European Accessibility Act (EAA) applies to any company offering products or services to consumers in the European Union, regardless of where that company is headquartered. For U.S. companies with EU customers, the EAA creates new accessibility obligations that went into effect on June 28, 2025. EAA Implications for U.S. Companies Key Point What It
Evaluating whether your website is ADA compliant requires more than running a single scan. A real evaluation combines automated scans with a thorough (manual) audit conducted by an accessibility professional, because scans alone only flag approximately 25% of accessibility issues. Key Points for Evaluating Website ADA Compliance Key Point What It Means Scans Cover 25%